Given the publication of Joey Barton’s photo with the English Defence League’s (EDL) Tommy Robinson tonight, I wonder if some of those from within the liberal intelligentisia that have been in awe of Barton in recent months have begun to have a rethink…?

Tom de Castella at the BBC reflected on how Barton “…has debated the ideological underpinnings of the Big Society, revealed a fondness for the lyrics of the Smiths, expressed an admiration for the engineer Isambard Kingdom Brunel, and shared aphorisms by Virgil, Seneca and Nietzsche”.

Robin Scott-Elliot in the Independent described him as “Barton the football-philosopher” noting his apparent “fondness for Nietzsche”.

A day later, Andy Martin in the Independent wrote, “Move over Eric Cantona. Enough trawlers and seagulls. Joey Barton has taken over as football’s No 1 philosopher”. He went on, “…as he is being squeezed out by Newcastle United, he has turned to philosophy for support. On Twitter, he has recruited a Premiership team of attackers and defenders, including Nietzsche, Goethe, Virgil, Proust, Norman Mailer, and the well-known nippy left-winger, George Orwell”.

Martin concluded by describing Barton as “an intellectual manqué…” before somewhat flippantly suggesting that all his “misdemeanours can be attributed to his frustration at the lack of a decent dialectician to tackle”.

Really…?

Those ‘misdemeanours’ include having been convicted twice on charges of violence. On 20 May 2008 Barton was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment for common assault and affray during an incident outside a McDonald’s restaurant in Liverpool City Centre for which he served 77 days in prison.

On 1 July 2008 he was  given a four months suspended sentence after admitting assault occasioning actual bodily harm on former Manchester City teammate Ousmane Dabo during a training ground dispute. For that, he was also charged with violent conduct by the Football Association.

Whilst also at Manchester City, in 2004 Barton was fined £60,000 for stubbing a lit cigar butt in Jamie Tandy’s eye, Tandy being a youth player at the club at the time.

Add into that various other on and off field incidents including the fact that his half-brother is in prison for racist murder and Barton’s list of ‘misdemeanours’ are impressive to say the least.

So how might the ‘football-philosopher’ explain the photo with Robinson…?

A mistake…? Maybe he didn’t know who Robinson was…? Could it be that the EDL duped him into having the photo…???

Surely given Barton’s significant intelligence and political awareness, he would have known who Robinson was and so none of these can possibly stand.

Of course if Barton is indeed as intelligent as some are suggesting, then maybe the photo of Robinson was a deliberate attempt to negate the negation (see theories of dialectic philosophy for more information). Then again, maybe that’s all part of the hype of the intelligentsia.

Personally I don’t believe the Barton hype: anyone can find a good quote from Nietzsche, Goethe, Virgil, Proust, Mailer, Orwell et al by searching on Google. Over the years Barton has shown his true colours again and again and so this photo surely comes as no surprise to most people.

Philosopher or idiot, I’ll leave you to decide but as we can draw from Nietzsche, Barton’sphilosopher of choice, “all credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses”. Use and come to your senses people and the truth about Barton is clear.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Barton ‘the football-philosopher’ and the Leader of the EDL

  1. Not many people would know who Robinson is – I’d say Barton doesn’t know who he is. He may be a thug, he may be a clever guy, I don’t know, but I don’t think you’re giving him the benefit of the doubt here. It’s opportunism by the EDL, the same as they did when they got a picture with Jordan.

    1. Since posting this, Dylan has also made email contact, reproduced below:

      “I’m writing regarding your article about Joey Barton being pictured with Tommy Robinson of the EDL. I commented at the time that I felt you weren’t giving Barton the benefit of the doubt. This seems borne out by Barton’s quote on Twitter shortly after the photo surfaced:

      “Can I just state, that should any person, ask me for a photograph when I’m in public, that I am not aware of their religious, political or personal beliefs or affiliations. If I smile and oblige their request, I do so for no other reason, than they’ve asked politely and respectfully.

      However this does not mean I am friends or share their beliefs. I categorically refuse to publicly release a statement, because I refuse to raise awareness in a group of mentally deficient right wing numpties. Hope u understand.”

      I’m respectfully asking you to amend, correct or remove the post to reflect Barton’s clear rebuttal.

      Regards
      Dylan Mitchell”

      Thanks for sending me this.

      I remember after Ron Atkinson described Marcel Desailly “a lazy nigger” on live tv he immediately and repeatedly stressed how he had been misunderstood and was in no way racist.

      For me, just because someone rebuts or refutes something they’ve said or done it, doesn’t necessarily mean that it should immediately be forgotten or swept under the carpet. It also doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s true.

      My post will therefore remain, capturing a particular incident within a wider context, one where Barton’s PR machine is somehow convincing people that he is clearly something that he is not. In my opinion this is merely the latest Barton faux pas and until convinced otherwise, I will maintain this opinion.

      We respectfully agree to disgree.

      Chris

      1. There’s a huge difference between this picture & Ron Atkinson saying the word ‘nigger’ and then denying being a racist. The EDL have form in this kind of thing for a start – they tried the same trick with Jordan a while ago, to much the same response from her. Also, it doesn’t stack up from a purely logical point of view – if Barton is trying to cultivate an intelligent persona, then posing with someone like Robinson clearly doesn’t fit into that. Robinson isn’t exactly a household name/face – I have a certain level of political savvy and I daresay I wouldn’t recognise him if I saw him in the street. Whether you have a point about Barton’s new intelligent character isn’t the case here. He’s certainly been a dickhead in the past. But on this particular point, regarding this particular picture, you’re being blinded by what you already think of him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s