For anyone who has read the post by Gary Younge on Comment is Free entitled, ‘When you watch the BNP on TV, just remember: Jack Straw started all this’, many I’m sure will conclude that he makes some good points. Not least when he notes that:
…there is little doubt that once the BNP is on Question Time, Jack Straw – or indeed anyone in the New Labour hierarchy – is in no position to take the fight to it. The same is true for most of the rest of the British political establishment that will be represented on the panel – they have either actively colluded or passively acquiesced in the political trajectory of the past decade.
But it is no accident that this happened on New Labour’s watch and no small irony that Jack Straw should set himself up as Griffin’s opponent.
In fact I couldn’t agree more. Why put up against the BNP’s Nick Griffin the very man that started the whole niqab furore a few years ago?
Continue reading ‘“I detest the niqab and the BNP: what does that make me?”’





Two Wrongs or Two Rights? Tatchell’s Non-Equitable Equalities
Tags: 1983, Bermondsey, Bermondsey by-election, Civil Partnership Act 2004, civil partnerships, Comment is Free, Equality, European Convention on Human Rights, heterophobia, heterosexual, homophobia, human rights, Islington, Katherine Doyle, Labour Party, London, marriage, outrage, Peter Tatchell, Screaming Lord Sutch, Simon Hughes, Tom Freeman
This week, Tatchell writes on Comment is Free about how is he supporting the right of a ’straight’ – read heterosexual – couple to have a civil partnership rather than a marriage. Why…?
Tatchell writes how Tom Freeman and Katherine Doyle have had their request for a civil partnership turned down by Islington registry office having been handed a letter of refusal that informed them how Part One of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 states that they apply to same-sex couples only. Adding that this is the first ever challenge to the ban on heterosexual couples having a civil partnership, Freeman and Doyle will first have to go through the British courts and, if this fails, appeal to the court in Strasbourg.
For Tatchell, it is arguable that the ‘ban on straight couples’ breaches the European Convention on Human Rights under articles 8, 12 and 14 respectively, protecting the right to privacy, marriage and non-discrimination. From a man that completely disregarded the right to privacy of those he forcibly ‘outed’, such a claim is pretty rich.
Continue reading ‘Two Wrongs or Two Rights? Tatchell’s Non-Equitable Equalities’